ENGLISH EDITION OF THE WEEKLY CHINESE NEWSPAPER, IN-DEPTH AND INDEPENDENT
site: HOME > > Economic > Opinion
Interests of Farmers Forgotten in Urbanization Push
Summary:


By Zhong Ang (种昂)
Issue 634, August 26, 2013
Nation, page 15
Translated by Laura Lin
Original article: [Chinese]

This year China has raised the curtain on its blueprint for urbanization reform (城镇化改革). The central government has already said that it regards "urbanization" (城镇化) as "not only as a historic mission of modernizing infrastructure" (现代化建设的历史任务) but also as the best way to expand domestic demand (扩大内需的最大潜力所在).

An investment boom is about to begin. As forecast in the Plan For Promoting Healthy Urban Development (2011-2020) which is being led by the National Development and Reform Commission, Chinese urbanization will result in 40 trillion yuan ($6 trillion) of investment over the next decade.

Most of the urbanization pilot projects being trialed around the country are top-down arrangements, with the government the driving force behind the push. Although each region has its own original initiatives, the basic outline of what is happening across the country follows this formula: urbanization = the consolidation of land + the concentration of populations (土地集中+人口集中=城镇化).

The essence of urbanization is to reform the relationship between people and the land.

To begin with, the transfer and concentration of rural land will put an end to the existing method of farming which is based on small scattered family plots.

The use of machines and modern techniques will raise the scale of farming, lift the value of output and release a great amount of surplus labor. The surplus labor will in turn be resettled in concentrated and newly built towns. Meanwhile, the sale of land plots resulting from the merging of villages will bring money rolling into the various levels of government.

This will result in a significant changes in both traditional farming methods and lifestyles of rural families that have developed over thousands of years.

But as people enthusiastically talk about how domestic demand is to be stimulated, how macroeconomic development is to be maintained, how it is fortunate that land financing will continue and how local government debt crises can be avoided, how there are business investment opportunities and the prosperous prospects for related industries, it becomes obvious that those who will be most affected by these reforms — the agricultural sector, villages and farmers - are scarcely heard at all.

As one businessman put it, this is similar to the policy of Electrical Goods to the Countryside (家电下乡), in which subsidies were provided to rural residents who bought designated home appliances. Though the government put in billions to subsidize these rural dwellers of very modest income, they nonetheless still questioned whether it was really for them or simply a ploy to help the appliance businesses. One farmer complained that the solar water heater he bought did not function with the rural water and broke very quickly. And of course it was extremely troublesome to get it fixed in the countryside.

Likewise, it's not hard to understand why the urbanization push in some areas of the country has resulted in farmers having their houses forcibly demolished (被强拆) or being forced into high-rise apartments (被上楼).

These relocated farmers might find that they can't dry their grains in the modern apartments that they've been settled in, nor are there places to rear their livestock and park their farming machinery. Meanwhile, the authorities can reap huge profits, by obtaining farming land on the cheap and then selling if for ten to perhaps a hundred times that amount at auction.

Farmers Get the Short Stick

One Zhejiang official responsible for land affairs worries that while various local authorities demolish villages and build apartments, they are not considering the farmers’ real needs. He says that without jobs farmers won't stay in these new towns. They are bound to leave for bigger cities and these new places will become ghost towns.

It is fair to say that urbanization will release a potential "land dividend" (土地红利) and provide a new impetus for China's future development. And it's also true that urbanization will free farmers from the land, pushing them to work in cities and boost their productive capacity and wages. The problem is — and nobody can deny this — that farmers are not likely to be the big winners from urbanization's opening up of the land dividend.

Even though the farmers are relocated to large 120 square meter apartments and are given 200,000 to 300,000 yuan in compensation, they are still not getting their full share of the spoils of urbanization. The government is able to acquire land on the outskirts of towns and cities on the cheap and then, by re-zoning the land, auction it off at market value. However, farmers are prevented from selling their land directly due to the current land administration rules.

Any reform should take into account the interests of those directly affected. Alas, in China, the reality is that "people who never take public transport are studying the public transport pricing policy and people who eat specially supplied foods are the ones formulating food safety policy" (一群从不坐公交车的在研讨公交调价;一群吃特供的在制定食品安全政策).

So, when the people responsible for China's massive urbanization push are viewing the policy from a macro-economic level and promoting it from the angle of solving the challenges facing urban and local governments and how it can contribute to industrial development, how are we able to ensure that the interests of rural residents are not being overlooked and infringed upon.

At this moment, when a new round of urbanization is about to be unleashed, all levels of government ought to change their top-down approach.

They should consider the real needs and interests of rural residents: improve their employment prospects, reform the household registration system and address issues related to housing, education, social security and health care.

After all, the main battlefield of urbanization is taking place on land that farmers have lived off for generations.

News in English via World Crunch (link)

Related Stories

0 comments

Comments(The views posted belong to the commentator, not representative of the EO)

username: Quick log-in

EO Digital Products

Multimedia & Interactive

Podcast
Podcast